SECMP0026 Changes to the Security Sub-Committee Nomination Process

Proposer Geoff Huckerby
Lead Analyst SEC Change
Date raised 12/12/2016
StageImplemented
Implementation date 15/03/2017
Latest update This modification was implemented on 15 March 2017

What is the issue?

This modification seeks to alter the current Security Sub-Committee’s (SSC) member nomination process in three areas to:

  • require that nominators must hold a relevant senior position within their organisation;

  • grant the SSC authority to reject nominees if they lack relevant security expertise; and

  • require that nominees undergo security vetting.

What is the solution?

SECMP0026 proposes to alter the current SSC membership nomination process so that it:
1. requires that nominators must hold a relevant senior position within their organisation;
2. grants the SSC authority to reject nominees if they lack relevant security expertise; and
3. requires that nominees undergo security vetting.

Who is impacted?

Impacts only to Security Sub-Committee members

What SEC documents are affected?

Section G 'Security'

Modification documents

SECMP0026 - FMR Attachment C - Change Board vote outcome
23/02/2017
SECMP0026 - Final Modification Report (post CB vote)
23/02/2017
SECMP0026 - FMR Attachment B - Consultation Responses
23/02/2017
SECMP0026 - FMR Attachment A - Legal Text
23/02/2017
SECMP0026 - Final Modification Report
23/02/2017
SECMP0026 Attachment A - Draft Legal Text
18/01/2017
SECMP0026 - Modification Report
18/01/2017
SECMP0026 - Initial Modification Report
16/01/2017
SECMP0026 - Attachment A - Draft Legal Text
13/12/2016
SECMP0026 - Modification Proposal Form
13/12/2016
No files
No files
No files
No files
No files

If you believe there is a problem with this modification, please let us know HERE.