Changes to the Security Sub-Committee Nomination Process

1

Development Stage

2

Refinement Process

3

Report Phase

4

Pending Implementation

5

Implemented

Proposer

E.ON - Geoff Huckerby

Priority

Not determined

Lead Analyst

SEC Change

Date raised

12/12/2016

Last Updated

29/07/2024

Stage

Implemented

Implementation date

15/03/2017

Impacted Documents

SEC Section G – Security

Governance

Self Governance

Latest Update

This modification was implemented on 15 March 2017

What is the issue?

This modification seeks to alter the current Security Sub-Committee’s (SSC) member nomination process in three areas to:

require that nominators must hold a relevant senior position within their organisation;
grant the SSC authority to reject nominees if they lack relevant security expertise; and
require that nominees undergo security vetting.

What is the solution?

SECMP0026 proposes to alter the current SSC membership nomination process so that it:
1. requires that nominators must hold a relevant senior position within their organisation;
2. grants the SSC authority to reject nominees if they lack relevant security expertise; and
3. requires that nominees undergo security vetting.

Modification Documents

Document	Category	Date	Action
SECMP0026 – Modification Report v1.0	Modification	15/11/2017	Download
Annex A – SECMP0026 – Legal Text v1.0	Modification	15/02/2017	Download
Annex B – SECMP0026 – Modification Report Consultation Responses v1.0	Modification	15/02/2017	Download

SECMP0026 'Changes to the Security Sub-Committee Nomination Process'

Sign Up to SEC Newsletter