SECMP0026 Changes to the Security Sub-Committee Nomination Process

Proposer Geoff Huckerby
Lead Analyst SEC Change
Date raised 12/12/2016
StageImplemented
Implementation date 15/03/2017
Latest update This modification was implemented on 15 March 2017

What is the issue?

This modification seeks to alter the current Security Sub-Committee’s (SSC) member nomination process in three areas to:

  • require that nominators must hold a relevant senior position within their organisation;

  • grant the SSC authority to reject nominees if they lack relevant security expertise; and

  • require that nominees undergo security vetting.

What is the solution?

SECMP0026 proposes to alter the current SSC membership nomination process so that it:
1. requires that nominators must hold a relevant senior position within their organisation;
2. grants the SSC authority to reject nominees if they lack relevant security expertise; and
3. requires that nominees undergo security vetting.

Who is impacted?

Impacts only to Security Sub-Committee members

What SEC documents are affected?

Section G 'Security'

Timeline

12 Dec 2016
Modification Raised
13 Jan 2017
Modification Report presented to Panel
16 Jan 2017
to
06 Feb 2017
Modification Report Consultation
22 Feb 2017
Change Board Vote
15 Mar 2017
Implementation

Modification documents

SECMP0026 - FMR Attachment C - Change Board vote outcome
23/02/2017
SECMP0026 - Final Modification Report (post CB vote)
23/02/2017
SECMP0026 - FMR Attachment B - Consultation Responses
23/02/2017
SECMP0026 - FMR Attachment A - Legal Text
23/02/2017
SECMP0026 - Final Modification Report
23/02/2017
SECMP0026 Attachment A - Draft Legal Text
18/01/2017
SECMP0026 - Modification Report
18/01/2017
SECMP0026 - Initial Modification Report
16/01/2017
SECMP0026 - Attachment A - Draft Legal Text
13/12/2016
SECMP0026 - Modification Proposal Form
13/12/2016
No files
No files
No files
No files
No files

If you believe there is a problem with this modification, please let us know HERE.